|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
darius mclever
   |
Posted - 2010.02.19 16:13:00 -
[1]
cant you use the search? this has been discussed to death more than once.
but i will be nice. a summary:
- we dont need more t2 bpo
- this also doesnt mean t2 bpos have to go.
- invention is fine. it can create a much higher volume of items.
- if you want to be more competitive train up your invention skills.
- if you think t2 is not profitable. you are doing it wrong.
just some recent postings that might illustrate it for you:
Linkage
Linkage2
reading the whole thread is worth it. but those 2 postings illustrates the points.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 18:21:00 -
[2]
first i dont own any bpo.i just live happily from invention. all your argumentation shows me you didnt read the 2nd linkage from my posting. there a bpo owner explained why he still makes more profit from invention than from his bpo. cheaper production cost is not everything. you also need volume. and for volume invention beats t2 bpos large scale.
do your math and stop claiming things.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 18:57:00 -
[3]
you run 11x 10 run bpcs in parallel. :)
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 19:36:00 -
[4]
Edited by: darius mclever on 19/02/2010 19:36:16
the problem you try to solve with t2 bpo wont be solved that way. t2 invention is really the solution to the problem.
if you want to buff invention a bit, a skill that preserves input ME/PE i could support.
before i forget it. if you really want a t2 bpo. the sell order forum has plenty.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.03.02 02:14:00 -
[5]
 Originally by: Reinforced Mode
I agree, bring back t2 bpos. Give a very slight chance to get one with eavh invention try.
I see a lot of t2 bpo owners saying it is ok , no need to change. They fear losing the easy isk, fear what eve should be about, competition.
If they dont fear competition, why post so much and get so annoyed ?
Those are actually people doing inventions, who tell you that we dont need more T2 BPOs.
you want one? buy one, just like the rest of us.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.03.02 23:52:00 -
[6]
Originally by: noamuth Z'ress
in a nut shell.
haveing an option to atemp to invent for a bpo like the bpc's would allow people to try for it if they wanted to.
the option of less then 1% chance of getting one per 10-100 success is just an other option.
but the first means if you want to you try and can fail.
2nd is the same but more random i think.
really 1% chance?
that gives me roughly 10 t2 bpos every month. yes i really run about 1000 inventions per month. so that means within a year i will have 120-130 t2 bpos!
but then again ... introducing new t2 bpos is stupid.
the only decent idea about invention i have ever read:
preserve some ME/PE from the input bpc in the invented bpc without the use of decryptors.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.03.03 02:57:00 -
[7]
adv. lab operation 4 gives you 10 lines 1100 inventions are just 110 batches of inventions. so about 35 a day.
does that sound many?
seriously ... if you want t2 bpos, earn your money with invention and buy some.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.03.03 15:15:00 -
[8]
to quote the assembly hall thread:
Originally by: Mr LaForge
*posting in a "I don't have a T2 BPO so no one else should either" thread*
just here they cry for more t2 bpos.
|
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2010.03.03 15:37:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Danton Marcellus
Originally by: darius mclever
cant you use the search? this has been discussed to death more than once.
but i will be nice. a summary:
- we dont need more t2 bpo
- this also doesnt mean t2 bpos have to go.
- invention is fine. it can create a much higher volume of items.
- if you want to be more competitive train up your invention skills.
- if you think t2 is not profitable. you are doing it wrong.
just some recent postings that might illustrate it for you:
Linkage
Linkage2
reading the whole thread is worth it. but those 2 postings illustrates the points.
What do you base your 'need' assessment on? I for one would like to see more tech II BPOs seeded into the game, via lucking out on invention for one. Endless grind for copies doesn't appeal to me. Neither does the constant harping from the havenots about their removal.
I'm a tech II BPO holder and I'd like to stay that way, regardless of how profitable they may become in the future. I have a tech II BPO, the BPO is mine.
i dont want to get rid of your t2 bpos. i am fine with you having them. i do my inventions, you produce from the bpo. the market cake is big enough for both of us. =)
|
|
|
| |
|